The ongoing bin strike in Birmingham, led by Unite the Union, has taken a critical legal turn following the High Court's decision to extend an injunction preventing workers from obstructing bin lorries - indefinitely. This development comes amid a long-running industrial dispute between the commissioner-run Birmingham City Council [1] and refuse workers over severe pay cuts and job losses, which has left the city with more than 12,000 tonnes of uncollected waste.

The dispute, which escalated into all-out strike action beginning on March 11, 2025, stems from the council's attempt to restructure refuse services. Workers face proposed salary reductions of up to £8,000-£10,000 per year and the elimination of roles such as the Waste Reduction and Collection Officer (WRCO). These proposals are part of a wider £300 million cost-cutting plan, enforced by government-appointed commissioners following the council's bankruptcy in 2023. The Labour-run council is under pressure from austerity measures first initiated by the Conservative government and now continued by the Labour government under Keir Starmer.

Supporters at the Lifford Lane Depot, 09/03/2025 - Photo: Adam Yosef

Despite weeks of negotiation via the conciliation service ACAS, Unite rejected the council's April 7 offer, stating it was inadequate and diluted by political interference. A revised proposal arrived at the end of May, but Unite leadership, including General Secretary Sharon Graham, said it fell short of the expectations established during the ACAS-mediated talks.

On May 23, 2025, Birmingham City Council was granted an interim High Court injunction to restrict picketing activity. The council alleged that refuse workers had increasingly blocked bin lorries from leaving depots, posing a public health and safety risk by disrupting citywide waste collection.

What is not acknowledged is that these lorries are being used to break the strike through agency labour. The use of legal and police powers to suppress the pickets is an attempt to undermine the strike and deny workers the ability to organise in their own defence. Workers do not accept strike-breaking, and it is a matter of principle that they do not cross picket lines when others are in dispute.

Originally, the injunction was to remain in place until a scheduled hearing on May 30. However, on May 29, a "consent order" was agreed upon by the council, resulting in the High Court extending the injunction indefinitely. The order imposes strict limits on picketing: no more than six pickets per depot, all in high-visibility clothing, confined to designated zones. Tactics such as "slow walking" or sitting on roads are banned. Violations may result in contempt of court charges, including fines or imprisonment.

The council was reportedly pleased with the decision, which keeps the injunction in place without the need for further court proceedings.

Police break picket line, Atlas Road Depot - Photo: Nick Wilkinson, Birmingham Live

Unite, however, contends that the injunction was imposed unjustly. The union argues it was given insufficient notice of the original hearing and had no opportunity to present its case. It now plans to gather evidence and consult legal counsel to challenge the order in court. In the meantime, it has committed to peaceful and lawful picketing.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has also criticised the strikers, stating they cannot be allowed to block vehicles. In March, the government authorised the military to assist with strike-breaking logistics. This top-level intervention reveals the seriousness with which the state views the threat of successful worker-led resistance.

While complying with the injunction's terms for now, Unite does not accept the legitimacy of the court's actions. It maintains that the legal process was flawed and remains committed to challenging the injunction's foundation.

Government intervention in industrial relations is becoming increasingly assertive, and relations have broken down to unprecedented levels. The indefinite extension of the court injunction represents a significant escalation in this months-long conflict, with wide repercussions. The workers' movement - which has declared that Enough is Enough! - is now directly confronting the offensive against the working class.

The union has defined the strike as a "fire and rehire" situation. This signals that the contract that guarantees rights to a decent livelihood and living standards has broken down. It reflects a broader erosion of the security and dignity of labour. It also gives new emphasis to the fact that the ruling elite can no longer claim legitimacy to govern. By standing united and defending their dignity, the bin workers embody the spirit of Enough is Enough! Their determined struggle reflects a clear belief that there is a way out of the crisis - through resistance to the cuts and by fighting for an alternative. In doing so, they assert their own voice and perspective, showing what it means for workers to be in the driving seat. This dispute makes clear that people must have control over their livelihoods and living conditions. The fight of the bin workers is part of that wider demand.

(Sources: Unite the Union, Workers' Forum, news agencies)

Notes
1. As Workers' Weekly explained in March:
The public authority in Birmingham has been systematically wrecked in recent years, significantly including the effects of severe government funding cuts, culminating in its alleged "bankruptcy" in August 2023. How the council of Britain's second city can be declared financially bankrupt is the height of capital-centric irrationality. The massive value created by the services it provides could not be clearer as the effects of this strike unfold.
Rather, this so-called bankruptcy has been the excuse to appoint commissioners representing private interests, in what amounts to a coup at the level of local government. These commissioners were handed control of the council by the previous government in October 2023, which appointed six commissioners and two political advisors to oversee the council. The commissioners, led by Max Caller, effectively exercise control over the council via extensive powers, including amending budgets and appointing or dismissing senior staff. Their role is to guide the council through a "recovery" plan, which may involve selling assets, cutting services, and increasing council tax.
"Birmingham Bin Workers Militantly Strike", Workers' Weekly, March 23, 2025
https://www.rcpbml.org.uk/wwie-25/ww25-07/ww25-07-06.htm

Link to Full Issue of Workers' Weekly

RCPB(ML) Home Page

Workers' Weekly Online Archive